Chapter five summary of freakonomics

According to the data developed from the ECLS, a low birth weight is correlated with lower test scores on standardized tests, but the attendance by a child in the Head Start program is not.

Active Themes For a long time, studies have shown an income gap between black and white adults. From a pro-life view of the world: The authors argued that, after making necessary changes to fix the original errors, the corrected link between abortion and crime was now weaker but still statistically significant, contrary to Foote and Goetz's claims.

This created a chaotic situation in which hundreds of thousands of teenagers were trying to get into the schools that were perceived as being the best in the district, submitting their test results, grades, etc.

Statistically, the wrestler should have a slightly below even chance, since the wrestler is slightly better. One of the most surprising results of the DoE study is the lack of correlation between television watching and academic success.

Freakonomics commented on the effects of an abortion ban in Romania Decreestating that "Compared to Romanian children born just a year earlier, the cohort of children born after the abortion ban would do worse in every measurable way: One possible explanation is that families with lots of books in the house tend to be well educated, hard working, and have higher IQs.

The only way to be fair was to use a lottery system for the students who applied to schools with more applicants than availabilities. Active Themes One reason that parents are so easily convinced by parenting experts is that parents—and, in fact, all human beings—are bad at assessing risk.

To be politically incorrect is one thing; to be simply incorrect quite another. In order to understand this monumental study, sociologists and economists have used regression analysis. The authors posit that various incentives encourage teachers to cheat by assisting their students with multiple-choice high-stakes tests.

This seems exceptionally strange, since one would imagine that that reason why books correlate with academic success is, at least in part, because reading books makes you smarter. To understand the DoE data, the authors will have to use mathematics while also introducing their own subjective interpretations of the data.

If you were a government official with limited financial resources, how would this inform your decisions regarding the allocation of government funds?

Freakonomics - Chapter 1 Summary & Analysis

The book's chapters cover: From a pro-life view of the world: Following the Supreme Court case, Roe v. The crack business, just like any other competitive business in America, is attractive to people because of its potential rewards.

Another case of cheating is sumo wrestling. One of the best ways to understand how incentives work is to analyze cheating in different walks of life. The DoE study will take up the remainder of the chapter: Describe the difference between normative and positive analysis.

Freakonomics - Chapter 5 Summary & Analysis

Here is the abstract of the version of the Pop-Eleches paper that we cited: Foote and Goetz, however, soon produced a rebuttal of their own and said that even after analyzing the data using the methods that Levitt and Donohue recommend, the data does not show a positive correlation between abortion rates and crime rates.

But it also seems fundamentally irrational to be more frightened of mad-cow disease than of heart disease, or more frightened of plane crashes than car crashes.

First of all, however, the book defines the three types of incentives: The economics of drug dealingincluding the surprisingly low earnings and abject working conditions of crack cocaine dealers Chapter 4: However, controlling for composition using observable background variables, children born after the ban on abortions had worse educational and labor market achievements as adults.

Not for the first time, the authors suggest a hypothesis that might be offensive or disturbing and certainly, there are intelligent women who have no financial option but to offer their children up for adoption.Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Chapter 5: The negligible effects of good parenting on education; Chapter 6: The socioeconomic patterns of naming children Full summary of Freakonomics.

Freakonomics: Chapter 5 Charlie Munger says the most important rule in management is "Get the incentives right". Munger argues that the power of incentives is. According to Chapter 5 of Freakonomics, there is a black-white test score gap and that gap is larger when you compare black and white students from the same school.

Chapter 1 Summary. In Chapter 1, Freakonomics demonstrates how incentives affect human behavior.

Freakonomics - Chapter 5 Summary & Analysis

As the book explains, economics is the study of incentives, which are ways to get people to do good rather than bad things. Freakonomics by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner - What makes a Perfect Parent?

The Explanation Our chapter, What Makes a Perfect Parent, is about the effects of parents may or may not have on a child. It also looks at the effects of culture and other things on standard tests.

Transcript of Freakonomics - Chapter 5. Freakonomics by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner - What makes a Perfect Parent?

Freakonomics Summary

The Explanation Our chapter, What Makes a Perfect Parent, is about the effects of parents may or may not have on a child. It also looks at the effects of culture and other things on standard tests.

Chapter five summary of freakonomics
Rated 3/5 based on 42 review